Healthcare influencer marketing: FTC rules for practices

Influencer marketing reaches people in a way a website or an ad often cannot. A local creator posts about their visit to your practice, or one of your own clinicians builds a following by explaining what they do. For a health care business, both carry legal duties that are easy to miss: the FTC treats these posts as advertising, and anything filmed in your office can involve other patients’ information.

This guide covers the rules in plain terms. It does not name or recommend any influencers, platforms or brands. Programs that recruit your own patients to post and speak for you are covered in patient ambassador and peer advocate programs. For streaming procedures or patient care live from your office, see our guide to livestreaming procedures on social media. Paid spokespeople, celebrities and actors in your own ads are covered in our guide to celebrity and spokesperson endorsements in practice ads. When the person posting is the owner or an employee instead of a paid creator, see our guide to staff posting on Reddit, forums and Wikipedia. Commissions earned through product links are covered in affiliate links on health content. Reposting unpaid patient posts that tag the practice is covered in reposting patient posts and tags.

When a post becomes an endorsement

Under the FTC’s Endorsement Guides (16 CFR Part 255, revised effective July 26, 2023), a post that reflects someone’s opinion of your services and that you have arranged, paid for or rewarded in any way is an endorsement in your advertising. The FTC’s guide for influencers lists the relationships that count: any financial, employment, personal, or family relationship with a brand. It adds that financial relationships aren’t limited to money: if the person got anything of value, such as a free or discounted treatment, that is a connection to disclose.

That means the most common health care arrangements are covered: a free treatment in exchange for a post, a discount code that pays the creator per booking, a staff member posting about where they work, or a friend of the owner promoting the practice.

Rule 1: the connection must be disclosed clearly

Section 255.5 requires a clear and conspicuous disclosure when a connection between the endorser and the business might materially affect the weight people give the endorsement and the audience would not expect it. The FTC’s guide for influencers explains what that looks like in practice:

• The disclosure goes with the endorsement itself, not only on a profile page, at the end of a video, or behind a “more” link.
• It is not mixed into a group of hashtags or links.
• In a photo or story, it is placed over the image long enough to read. In a video, it is in the video itself, ideally in both audio and on screen. In a live stream, it is repeated.
• Plain words work: “ad,” “advertisement,” “sponsored,” or a simple statement that the practice provided the treatment for free. Vague terms such as “sp,” “spon” or “collab” do not.
• A platform’s built-in paid partnership label may help, but the FTC says not to assume a platform’s disclosure tool is good enough on its own.

Rule 2: the practice is responsible too

It is not enough for the influencer to get it right. Section 255.1(d) says advertisers are subject to liability for misleading or unsubstantiated statements made through endorsements, and for failing to disclose material connections, and an advertiser may be liable even when the endorser is not. The same section says advertisers should provide guidance to endorsers, monitor their compliance, and take action to fix problems. Agencies and other intermediaries can also be liable under 255.1(f).

In practice, that means a written agreement, a short guide for the creator, a review of posts before or right after they go live, and a clear process for asking for corrections or removals. The same duties apply to members a company rewards inside its own community; see our guide to brand-run patient communities.

Rule 3: no health claims you could not make yourself

An endorsement may not say anything that would be deceptive if the practice said it directly (255.1(a)). Section 255.2(a) adds that claims made through consumer endorsements need the same substantiation as claims the advertiser makes, including competent and reliable scientific evidence when appropriate. The FTC’s influencer guide puts it simply: you can’t make up claims about a product that would require proof the advertiser doesn’t have, such as scientific proof that a product can treat a health condition.

The same rule on typical results applies as for patient testimonials: if a creator’s result is not what patients generally get, the post needs to say what is typical. Our guide to patient testimonials and before-and-after photos explains that rule. The influencer also has to have actually had the treatment they describe; the FTC says you can’t talk about your experience with a product you haven’t tried.

Rule 4: clinicians as influencers are experts

When a physician, dentist, nurse practitioner or other clinician promotes something, the audience hears an expert. Section 255.3 says that when an ad represents the endorser as an expert, the endorser’s qualifications must actually give them that expertise, and the endorsement must be supported by an actual exercise of that expertise in evaluating the product.

• A clinician posting about their own practice should make the employment or ownership relationship clear when the audience would not already know it.
• A clinician paid by a product or device company to post about it has a material connection to disclose under 255.5.
• Speak only within your training and licensure, and follow your board’s rules. Our healthcare social media policy guide covers staff posting rules.

Rule 5: no fake followers, bought reviews or pressure on critics

The FTC’s rule on consumer reviews and testimonials (16 CFR Part 465, effective October 21, 2024) reaches several influencer tactics directly:

• Fake influence. Section 465.8 makes it a violation to buy or procure fake indicators of social media influence, such as fake followers or views, that the buyer knew or should have known were fake, when they misrepresent influence for a commercial purpose.
• Reviews for reward. Section 465.4 bans giving anything in exchange for reviews that express a particular sentiment. Asking an influencer to post a positive review on Google or Yelp in exchange for treatment falls into that.
• Pressure on critics. Section 465.7 bans using groundless legal threats, intimidation or public false accusations to stop or remove a consumer review. Do not ask a creator or their followers to go after someone who left a negative review.

Rule 6: filming in your office is a HIPAA question

If your practice is a HIPAA covered entity, a creator filming in your office can capture other patients, schedules, screens or conversations. HHS’s guidance on media and film crews says providers cannot invite or allow media personnel into treatment or other areas where patients’ information will be accessible without prior written authorization from each individual who is or will be in the area. It also says blurring or masking faces afterward is not sufficient for patients who did not authorize it.

• Film only in a space with no other patients, records, screens or schedules in view, or outside treatment hours.
• If the creator is also a patient and you want to reuse their content in your own marketing, get a written HIPAA authorization under 45 CFR 164.508.
• If a contract film crew will have access to patient information on your behalf, HHS says a business associate agreement is needed.
• If you see Medicare or Medicaid patients, ask counsel before offering free services to anyone who is also a patient; see our guide to referral rules.

A checklist for an influencer agreement

Have your attorney draft the agreement. These are the points it usually needs to cover, based on the rules above.

1. What the creator receives.Payment, free or discounted services, commission or codes, all listed.
2. Disclosure.How and where the connection will be disclosed in each format, matching the FTC’s guidance.
3. Claims.What the creator may and may not say about results, conditions and treatments, and a requirement to describe only their own real experience.
4. Review and corrections.Your right to review posts and to require corrections or removal.
5. Filming rules.Where and when filming may happen, and that no other patients or records may appear.
6. No review requests or fake engagement.No buying followers or views, and no review posting tied to the arrangement.
7. End of the relationship.What happens to existing posts and codes when the agreement ends.

Who owns creator content and the music in it is covered in our copyright, music and image rights guide.

How we help

We help practices plan social and local campaigns that fit the rules for health care advertising, and we keep tracking and patient information out of places it should not be. We do not broker influencer deals. See our integrative medicine marketing and med spa marketing services, or the full list in our healthcare marketing rules guide.

Frequently asked questions

Sources

• 16 CFR Part 255: Guides concerning the use of endorsements and testimonials in advertising (revised effective July 26, 2023)
• FTC: Disclosures 101 for Social Media Influencers
• 16 CFR Part 465: Use of consumer reviews and testimonials (effective October 21, 2024), sections 465.4, 465.7, 465.8
• FTC: Health Products Compliance Guidance
• HHS: Can health care providers invite members of the media, including film crews, into treatment areas without prior written authorization?
• 45 CFR 164.508: Uses and disclosures for which an authorization is required
• Google Maps: Prohibited and restricted content (fake engagement)
• HHS OIG: Fraud and Abuse Laws

More in Healthcare marketing rules